Interior Chief Nominee Should Fit In Just Fine

Published on Saturday, September 20, 2003 by the Miami Herald

by John Passacantando


Several months ago I attended a conference with the sole purpose of hearing Bill McKibben, the featured speaker. McKibben is the author of
The End of Nature, which foretold back in the 1980s the global-warming mess of today. I went to hear what the sage was going to predict for the world now and found him sharing a panel with Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt.

I didn't know whether Leavitt was a modern snake-oil salesman or just soliciting a Washington job, but he was clearly the classic character that we expect to see highly placed in the Bush administration. He gave a speech about his environmental ideology as if he were a Roman philosopher, dubbing it ''enlibra,'' which he explained means ''to move toward balance.'' He continuously praised the Bush administration and might just as well have put his resume up on the screen in PowerPoint.

It worked. President Bush nominated him to replace Christine Todd Whitman, the Environmental Protection Agency chief whom we will forever remember for telling us that the smoke plume from the 9/11 disaster site in New York was safe. Whitman used to talk about balance. Bush continues to. It got me wondering what they actually mean.

Bush gutted the Kyoto Protocol, the international agreement to stop global warming. His administration is allowing more pollution from power plants, more pollution in our water, more clear-cutting in our national forests, more oil and gas mining on our public lands and in coastal waters, more coal burning, more nuclear waste, more loss of endangered species.

As for Leavitt, his administration has among the worst clean-water enforcement records in the nation, even personally taking a hand in befouling the water through his family's fish farm, which was brought up on violations as a source of Utah's devastating, fish-crippling ``whirling disease.''

Leavitt fought for a boondoggle highway program that would have threatened the Great Salt Lake Wetlands, a world-renowned inland shorebird breeding ground. Fortunately, his plan was thwarted by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. The court rejected the highway on the grounds that Leavitt's key agencies were ''arbitrary and capricious'' in issuing construction permits.

STOPPED LAWSUITS

When Utah residents turned to Leavitt for protection from a 260,000 hog-raising operation that was spilling liquified manure from broken pipelines and leaking storage lagoons into the groundwater, he helped pass a law that prevents citizens from bringing nuisance suits against agricultural businesses.

Leavitt orchestrated two deals with the Bush administration to open up millions of acres of Utah wilderness to road-building and development. He supported more extensive mining and burning of coal and gas in Utah while bragging about cleaning up the air at the still-smoggy, still-hazy Grand Canyon.

As for what 18,000 EPA employees can expect if Leavitt is confirmed, just talk to the biologists at Utah's Division of Wildlife Resources who were purged for listing endangered species -- an act that could get in the way of new water diversions from already overtaxed rivers and fancy new subdivisions.

Given all of this, ''enlibra'' must refer to the balance sheets of corporations and their benefactors, making Leavitt a perfect fit for this administration. He should come to Washington, D.C., but he should rent and not buy.

Once the public figures out what he and these others are really up to, we can all borrow another phrase from the Romans -- ciao -- and get back to listening to Bill McKibben.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.