Peaceful Protest Under Attack

Published on Friday, April 9, 2004 by the Denver Post

Editorial

Peaceful protest has been a cherished American right since the Boston Tea Party, but that fundamental liberty is under attack in a federal court in Miami.

In 2002, members of the activist environmental group Greenpeace tried peacefully to board a freighter headed for Miami in order to unfurl a banner calling for an end to illegal logging. Greenpeace said the freighter was hauling illegally harvested mahogany, an endangered species. The activists were arrested and fined.

Fifteen months later, the U.S. government went after Greenpeace with zeal that should be reserved for threats to national security. But this case isn't about security; it's about political retribution.

Federal prosecutors charged Greenpeace with a misdemeanor under an obscure 19th century law that forbids pimps from intercepting ships bound for port. The law against "sailormongering" has been used only twice, the last time more than 100 years ago, and in one case the judge said the statute was vague.

There's no precedent for federal prosecutors charging an organization with a crime for its members' peaceful protests. If the federal government had done so in the 1960s, there wouldn't have been NAACP lunch counter sit-ins and perhaps no civil rights movement.

There's reason to think that in the Miami case, the Bush administration is bullying an organization that has been particularly outspoken - and effective - in its criticism of Bush's environmental record.

If the feds win, the government will gain access to Greenpeace's databases and membership lists. The feds also could strip Greenpeace of its non-profit status, thus hurting the group's fundraising.
So if Greenpeace loses, American civil liberties will suffer a setback, and a disturbing legal precedent will have been set.

Today in federal court in Miami, U.S. District Judge Adelberto Jordan may rule on three motions from Greenpeace lawyers. One is a motion to dismiss the charges, another a request for a jury trial, and the third to let Greenpeace see government documents explaining why the feds filed charges. Greenpeace understandably contends the Justice Department has singled it out for prosecution.

Regardless of what Americans think of Greenpeace, they should hope the eco-group wins in court - for the sake of everyone's civil liberties.

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.