|
by: Environment News Service
Two lawsuits against the US Environmental Protection Agency have been filed in court this week because the agency allows the continued use of organochlorine pesticides. The pesticides are known to poison humans and wildlife.
(Photo: Healthday News)
San Francisco, California - This has been the week for going after pesticides in court. Since Thursday, July 24, two coalitions - with many of the same member groups - have filed two federal lawsuits challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for allowing the continued use of organochlorine pesticides.
These two organochlorine chemicals - endosulfan and diazinon - are persistent in the environment and poison humans and wildlife in agricultural areas where they are applied and also can travel by wind and water to poison others in regions far away.
"EPA's system for protecting the public from the dangers of pesticides like diazinon is broken," said Joshua Osborne-Klein, an attorney in the San Francisco office of Earthjustice, the public interest law firm that represents both coalitions. "The agency should be protecting farmworkers and children, not the profits of pesticide manufacturers."
Last Thursday, a lawsuit seeking to stop the use of endosulfan was brought by Earthjustice and Farmworker Justice on behalf of - Alaska Community Action on Toxics, Beyond Pesticides, Center for Environmental Health, Farm Labor Organizing Committee (AFL-CIO), Natural Resources Defense Council, Northwest Treeplanters and Farmworkers United, Pesticide Action Network North America, United Farm Workers, and Teamsters Local 890.
Endosulfan is an organochlorine, part of the same family of chemicals as DDT, which the EPA banned in 1972. Crops commonly treated with endosulfan include cotton, tomatoes, melons, squash, and tobacco.
Acute poisoning from endosulfan can cause headaches, nausea, vomiting, convulsions, and in extreme cases, unconsciousness and even death. Studies have linked endosulfan to smaller testicles, lower sperm production, and an increase in the risk of miscarriages.
"This dangerous and antiquated pesticide should have been off the market years ago," said Karl Tupper, a staff scientist with Pesticide Action Network. "The fact that EPA is still allowing the use of a chemical this harmful shows just how broken our regulatory system is."
The coalition claims that the EPA has failed to consider the risks to children. A 2007 study found that children exposed to endosulfan in the first trimester of pregnancy had a significantly greater risk for developing autism spectrum disorders.
It also poses risks to school children in agricultural communities where it has been detected at unsafe levels in the air.
In addition, endosulfan has been found in food supplies, drinking water, and in the tissues and breast milk of pregnant mothers.
"EPA has failed to protect children and endangered species from endosulfan poisonings," said Osborne-Klein. "We call on EPA to ban the use of endosulfan in the United States."
Endosulfan is especially toxic to fish and other aquatic life, the coalition charges, adding that the pesticide also affects birds, bees, earthworms, and other beneficial insects.
Osborne-Klein cites a recent federal study finding that national parks from Texas to Alaska are contaminated with endosulfan in amounts that threaten ecosystems and wildlife.
Endosulfan has been found in Sierra Nevada lakes and on Mt. Everest. "This persistent pesticide can also migrate to the Poles on wind and ocean currents where Arctic communities have documented contamination," the coalition said.
|
|
